Public record · updated as cases resolve

Recent tree law verdicts and settlements.

What courts, juries, and insurers are actually paying when someone cuts, poisons, or clears trees they don't own. Every entry links to its public source. Amounts are as reported; these are not TreeLawLeads cases.

$7.9Mreported across 16 resolved matters

$2.5Mlargest single resolution listed

11states represented

2–3×statutory multiplier in most states

~$750K sought

PENDING

Truro, MA: 25 trees felled for a neighbor's bay view; ~$750,000 treble claim filed

Truro, Barnstable County (Barnstable Superior Court), MA · Jul 16, 2025 · 25 mature trees felled, 3 more topped

The owners of a 1.5-acre rental-cottage property returned in May 2024 to find 25 healthy trees down and others topped, opening a water view for a house up the hill. Their suit alleges the neighbor arranged it with their own property manager while they were away. Replacement cost is pleaded at $243,200, trebled under the Massachusetts statute to roughly $750,000. The defendant's liability carrier has assigned defense counsel. Pending; listed for the fact pattern (absentee owner, insider access, view motive) that recurs in the largest cases on this page.

Defendant: Nearby homeowner + the plaintiffs' own property manager
Law: M.G.L. c. 242 § 7 (three times the value)
As reported by: Provincetown Independent ↗

pendingview clearingtreble damagesinsurer defending

$7M+ sought

PENDING

King County sues Issaquah homeowners for $7M+ after 142 park trees were cut for views

Grand Ridge Park, Issaquah, King County, WA · Jun 24, 2025 · 142 trees cut, topped, split or debarked

A trail camera caught a tree sliding down a hillside, which led county parks staff to a cleared swath of 142 trees inside a protected natural area behind a row of homes. The county filed a civil suit seeking more than $7 million plus civil penalties, including the increase in home values from the improved view, and asked for treble damages under Washington's timber trespass statute. One defendant was later dismissed. Pending; listed for the fact pattern and the damages theory, not as a recovery.

Defendant: Three adjoining property owners + contractors
Law: RCW 64.12.030 treble damages sought; county code penalties
As reported by: KIRO 7 ↗

pendingpublic landview clearingtrail camera evidence

Disclaimer. TreeLawLeads was not involved in any matter listed and has no affiliation with the parties, counsel, or publications cited. Compiled from news reports, court opinions, and counsel announcements; figures are as reported by the linked source and may include settlements whose full terms are confidential, penalties assessed by governments, and claims still pending. None of these are TreeLawLeads matters. Not legal advice, and not a prediction of what any other case is worth; verify the controlling statute and current status before relying on any entry. Know of a resolution we're missing? Send us the source.

What these numbers have in common

Every large result above rests on the same three things we screen for before a case reaches a firm: a survey or record that fixes ownership, an arborist's per-tree valuation, and a statute that multiplies it. The defendants who pay most are contractors, developers, and neighbors acting through a crew — insured, and on the wrong side of a line they were told about.

Per-tree appraisal drives it

$90,000 per mature tree in Maryland; $95,000 for one coast live oak in Oakland. Multiply by the count.

Willfulness unlocks the multiplier

Warnings ignored, lines flagged, notes left in mailboxes — that record is what turns 1× into 3×.

Insurers write the checks

Tree services, landscapers, and developers carry liability coverage. Most of the settlements above were paid by a carrier.

Cases with this fact pattern are on the shelf now.

Leave your email — we'll follow up within one business day with what's open in your states.